And if I am a Windows user I will use Waterfox and if I am a linux user I will use Mozilla Firefox.Beta / September 2, 2008 14 years ago ( )ġ.0 / December 11, 2008 14 years ago ( ) ![]() I say this because in some years most (if not all) of the computers will work in 64bits. My personal concept is that this is done with the intention of separating Mozilla Firefox y Waterfox between Linux and Windows. ![]() Waterfox is specifically for 64-bit systems, with one thing in mind: speed. Waterfox is a high performance browser based on the Mozilla Firefox source code. A browser based on Mozilla Firefox that only supports Windows and exclusively 64 bits. Turns out Mozilla has another project called waterfox. Please let us consider this discussion closed unless there is critical new information which needs to be presented. Given the existing information, I have decided to proceed with disabling windows 64-bit nightly and hourly builds. «Thank you to everyone who participated in this thread. Frustration for 64bit users because they feel (and are) in the background.Īdditionally, Mozilla thanks all the team that collaborated with the project.Errors reported by 64bit users do not have priority because we are working on other things.Plugins that are available are not working properly.Many Plugins are not available for 64bits.Mozilla lists the reasons why it decides to do this: Since there is a clear preference towards open source systems. This is a cheap blow to Windows users, but clearly great news for Linuxers. This sounds strange and counterintuitive given that current systems tend to use 64bits for performance reasons. ![]() That's right, Mozilla just announced that they will stop supporting Firefox to 64bits for Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |